FONSECA-ROBBINS, JOHN

Environmental Issues

Archive for the ‘BANKING’ Category

FORFAITING COUNTRY LIST UPDATE

Posted by mar19433 on May 12, 2007

UPDATING FORFAITING – FONSECA-ROBBINS
Countries and Maximum Maturities

Last Updated – Saturday, 12 May 2007

Americas
MaxYears
ARGENTINA
5
BOLIVIA
*
BRAZIL
5
CANADA
7
CHILE
5
COLOMBIA
5
COSTA RICA
3
DOMINICAN REP.
3
ECUADOR
*
EL SALVADOR
3
GUATEMALA
3
HONDURAS
1
JAMAICA
1
MEXICO
5
NICARAGUA
*
PANAMA
5
PERU
5
PUERTO RICO
5
T & TOBAGO
5
URUGUAY
3
U.S.A.
7
VENEZUELA
3
Africa
MaxYears
ANGOLA
1
BOTSWANA
5
BURKINA FASO
*
CAMEROON
*
ETHIOPIA
*
GABON
*
GAMBIA
*
GHANA
2
KENYA
3
LESOTHO
1
MADAGASCAR
1
MALAWI
*
MALI
*
MAURITANIA
*
MAURITIUS
5
MOZAMBIQUE
3
NAMIBIA
5
NIGERIA
3
SENEGAL
1
SOUTH AFRICA
7
SWAZILAND
2
TANZANIA
1
UGANDA
1
ZAMBIA
*

Europe
MaxYears
AUSTRIA
7
AZERBAIJAN
3
BELGIUM
7
BOSNIA
5
BULGARIA
5
CROATIA
5
CYPRUS
5
CZECH
5
DENMARK
7
EIRE
7
ESTONIA
5
FINLAND
7
FRANCE
7
GERMANY
7
GREECE
5
HUNGARY
5
ICELAND
5
ITALY
7
KAZAKHSTAN
5
LATVIA
5
LITHUANIA
5
LUXEMBOURG
7
MACEDONIA
3
MALTA
5
NETHERLANDS
7
NORWAY
7
POLAND
5
PORTUGAL
7
ROMANIA
5
RUSSIA
7
SERBIA
5
SLOVAKIA
5
SLOVENIA
5
SPAIN
7
SWEDEN
7
SWITZERLAND
7
TURKEY
5
U.K.
7
UKRAINE
3
UZBEKISTAN
2

Middle East
MaxYears
ALGERIA
5
BAHRAIN
5
EGYPT
5
ISRAEL
5
JORDAN
5
KUWAIT
5
LEBANON
1
LIBYA
5
MOROCCO
5
OMAN
5
QATAR
5
SAUDI ARABIA
5
TUNISIA
5
U.A.E.
5
Far East
MaxYears
AUSTRALIA
7
BANGLADESH
1
CHINA
5
HONG KONG
5
INDIA
5
INDONESIA
5
JAPAN
7
MALAYSIA
5
NEW ZEALAND
7
PAKISTAN
5
PHILIPPINES
5
SINGAPORE
7
SOUTH KOREA
5
SRI LANKA
2
TAIWAN
5
THAILAND
5
VIETNAM
5

* Transactions on these countries considered on a case by case basis
The countries listed above are those for which we are prepared to consider the discount on a “without recourse” basis and/or silent confirmation up to the period shown for bills of exchange, promissory notes, irrevocable letters of credit or receivables, normally guaranteed by a first class bank.

JFR

Posted in BANKING | Leave a Comment »

WHAT IS FORFAITING?

Posted by mar19433 on August 28, 2006

The word Forfaiting derives from the French “à forfait” or Forfaitierung (German) and Forfetizzazione (Italian) ; an expression implying the idea of a settlement, the terms of which are agreed in advance, and are therefore not liable to later discussion. Forfaiting is the term used to define the practice of buying trade credits/receivables (drafts, bills of exchange, promissory notes, guarantees, Letters of Credit, and other acceptable underlying debt instruments) falling due at some future date, arising mainly from goods and services – mostly export transactions – waiving at the same time, one’s right of recourse to any previous holder of the particular obligation. It is a blueprint for non-recourse financing.

Taking a simple example, an importer and an exporter close a commercial transaction that is embodied in a contract to exchange goods, machinery, key-turn plants, etc., for settlement in the near future. The exporter might decide he is reluctant to accept either the creditworthiness of the importer or the terms and conditions of the payment for the goods to be delivered. Thus, to reduce the credit risk, the exporter would require that the importer find a bank or other first class credit institution, which is willing to irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee his liabilities – upon evidence that the goods have been shipped. The institution would normally be resident in the importer’s country. However, when the buyer is resident in a third world country, the guarantor may well be a European bank.

The method of guarantee can take the following forms:

  • An aval, whereby the guarantor endorses bills of exchange/drafts drawn on the importer, thus becoming liable on them;
  • A separate form of guarantee of the importer’s liabilities. This usually applies when promissory notes are signed by the importer, as opposed to bills of exchange being used, and;
  • When the guarantor is a bank from the United States, the guarantee often takes the form of a Standby Letter of Credit whereby the American bank undertakes to honour bills of exchange drawn in the prescribed way.

The form of the guarantee is unimportant, provided the guarantee is legally binding. What really matters is the status of the guarantor institution.

Provided the guarantor is undoubted, the exporter’s bank, known as the forfaitist or forfaiter, will immediately proceed with the discounting (forfaiting) of the bills or promissory notes, i.e. will pay the exporter, within a few days if not sooner, after the shipment of the goods, the face value less the agreed discount charges, often applying the “discount to-yield method”. Thus, the exporter is able to fully offset his risk exposure and to bridge the deferred payment period, which typically varies between 30 days and seven years and for amounts as little as US$25.000 and up to several million on some large international transactions involving promissory notes.

If the importer is undoubted, then the forfait facility could be provided without the need of a guarantee from another institution.

It is rumoured that a UK football club was able to obtain forfait finance for the transfer of a UK soccer star to Italy. The forfaiting house did not require a guarantee because the Italian club was probably more creditworthy than its bank.

Benefits of Forfaiting to the Exporter:

  1. The facility is flexible. The documentation can be set up in a mater of hours and the forfait facility can cover the full amount of the contract price;
  2. Forfaiting means fixed-rate, short/middle-term finance: features that seldom go together in credit agreements;
  3. Finance is offered with no right of recourse against the exporter. There is no need for any contingent liability on the exporter’s balance sheet. Forfaiting does not affect any other facilities, e.g., overdrafts;
  4. The exporter receives cash in full at the outset. This improves liquidity, avoids indebtedness to banks and most important – generates resources available for other investments;
  5. All exchange risks, buyer risks, and country risks are removed;
  6. Administration and collection problems are also eliminated;
  7. Exporters can receive preliminary commitments by the Forfaiters to finance transactions at cost fixed in advance, and, by being able to submit both a commercial and a financial offer to the foreign buyer, exporters have indeed a strong competitive advantage over other manufacturers who cannot make similar offers.

Forfaiting is a highly specialised technique requiring experience people, and expertise in this field can only grow through years of constant practice. Moreover, it has a great potential as an investment tool, and, whilst particularly appreciated in the Transitional Economies and Emerging Markets, many exporters are still scarcely aware of the opportunities offered by this financing technique. The world’s economy would have much to gain from an improvement of export credit through a much wider use of forfaiting.

(Excerpt based on the book”Forfaiting: Specialised Investment Tool” – 1998- Edition, by John Fonseca-Robbins)

Posted in BANKING | Leave a Comment »

COLLATERALIZED DEBT OBLIGATIONS

Posted by mar19433 on January 10, 2006

Collateralized debt obligations are privately placed securitizations that were first created in the 80s. A securitization, in abstract terms, is a reallocation of risk. Securitization is the process of converting assets into securities backed by those assets and is used for:

  1. Lower funding costs
  2. Accounting purposes
  3. Accessing the capital markets
  4. Generating fees-servicing and underwriting

CDOs; collateralized bond obligations (CBOs); and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), are a successful application of sophisticated securitizations originally developed for collateratized mortgage-backed securities (CMBS)

These structuring techniques create special-purpose entities/vehicles (SPE/SPVs) to hold the underlying collateral. The SPE then issues securities backed by the underlying collateral pool. The underlying collateral’s cash flows are then used to pay interest and principal on the issued securities.

The subsequent securities’ higher credit quality is due in part to a fundamental concept in portfolio management theory – diversification. However, diversification is only part of the story.

TRANCHING

Diversification redistributes risk by “pooling” numerous underlying collateral risk-return profiles, thereby creating a single risk-return profile on the underlying collateral pool (the assets). Securitizations go one step further and seek to redistribute liability risk through a process known as tranching – taking the underlying collateral cash flow and dividing it among numerous tranche interest and principal components.

This means creating different classes of securities (the liabilities), each of which carry a different risk component defined by its payment priority and timing. Tranching creates multiple securities that appeal to different investors given the investor’s risk-return threshold.

For example, highly-rated securities will have a lower return and can appeal to institutional investors like pension funds. Lower-rated securities will have a higher return and can appeal to hedge fund managers who are willing to sacrifice safety for the juicer yields (up to 30 percent annually). Thus, the underlying collateral pool’s single risk-return profile (created through diversification) is transformed into multiple risk-return profiles on the newly created securities (liabilities).

In the end, a less attractive investment on the collateral side – even though risk is mitigated through diversification – is transformed into a more attractive investment opportunity by tranching.

Generally, CDOs are either “balance sheet” or “arbitrage”. Balance sheet CDOs are structured as “sales” for accounting and regulatory capital purposes but are “debt” for tax purposes.Banks use balance sheet CDOs primarily for portfolio management and regulatory capital efficiency.By contrast “arbitrage” CDOs are structured as sales for all purposes, including tax.

CDO Collateral Types

As Debt Securities:

  • Forfaiting Paper
  • Bonds (Senior, Unsecured, or Subordinated)
  • Distressed/Non-Performing
  • Junk Bonds
  • Emerging Market
  • Structured Finance (ABS,CBO/CLO,CMBS,REITS(real estate investment trusts) and RMBS)
  • Project Finance
  • Synthetic Securities

As Corporate Loans:

  • Term Loans
  • Revolving Loans
  • Secured & Unsecured
  • Syndicated Loans
  • Bilateral Loans
  • Distressed/Non-Performing Loans
  • Unfunded Commitments to Lend

CDOs employ many credit enhancement features including:

  1. Overcollateralization;
  2. Cash collateral/reserves;
  3. Excess spread/interest;
  4. Amortizing and insured tranches; and
  5. Hedges (interest rate swaps).

CDO Motivations under the Issuer’s perspectives;

As Arbitrage:

  1. Realize positive spread
  2. Increase assets under management
  3. Generate stable management fees, and
  4. Participate in equity upside.

As Balance Sheet:

  1. Capital relief
  2. Enhance lending capacity
  3. Lower funding cost
  4. Diversification of Funding sources, and
  5. Increase ROE.

Summary

CDOs are pools of debt instruments repackaged into slides, or tranches, carrying different levels of risk designed to spread risk by giving investors exposure to a range of underlying instruments.

Issuance is expected to grow from $175bn (€148bn)last year to $211bn, according to Citigroup’s CDO Outlook 2006 report. “A generally strong global economic environment, the need for high rating-adjusted spread product, an expanding investor base, an expanding issuer base and availability of collateral will all contribute to market growth in 2006″, the report concludes.

(q.v) http://www.fonseca-robbins.org/

Posted in BANKING | Leave a Comment »